Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations https://phair.psychopen.eu/index.php/phair <h1 class="font-weight-bold phair-journal"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations</span></h1> <h2 class="font-weight-bold" style="width: 70%;"><span style="color: #646464;">A new online-only, open-access journal for scientific inquiries into how humans interact with non-human animals</span></h2> <h2 class="font-weight-bold"><span style="color: #646464;"><em>Free of charge for authors and readers</em></span></h2> <hr noshade="noshade" size="”5″"> <p class="clearfix">The goal of the journal <em>Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations</em> (PHAIR) is to publish scientific research on a wide range of topics related to how people perceive, treat, and interact with animals. The journal is open to studies from moral and social psychology, attitudes and persuasion, diet and health, human-animal relationships, personality/individual differences, sustainability and environmental psychology, and other related sub-fields.</p> <p class="clearfix"><img class="float-left mr-3" src="/public/journals/31/phair-society.png"> PHAIR is the Official Academic Journal of the PHAIR Society (<a title="Link to PHAIR Society" href="https://phairsociety.org">PHAIRSociety.org</a>). The Mission of the PHAIR Society is to provide a forum for scientific scholarship that supports justice for non-human and human animals. PHAIR welcomes a diversity of opinions about what constitutes justice and how to achieve it; the society’s primary focus is on using psychological science to help answer these questions.</p> en-US editors@phair.psychopen.eu (Christopher J. Hopwood) support@phair.psychopen.eu (PsychOpen Technical Support Team) Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 -0700 OJS 3.1.2.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Exploring Public Support for Farmed Animal Welfare Policy and Advocacy Across 23 Countries https://phair.psychopen.eu/index.php/phair/article/view/10337 <p>Farmed animal policy and advocacy efforts both attempt to generate and depend upon public support. However, relatively little is known about the factors that predict support for animal protection legislation and advocacy across the globe. We analyse data from a large international survey (23 countries, n = 20,966) alongside other data sources on animal advocacy to investigate knowledge of factory farming, the connection between attitudes towards animals and the strength of animal protection legislation, attitudes towards animals based on their food status in different countries, and the connection between personal support for policy, animal advocacy, civic activism, and animal advocacy organisations. We found that higher support for animal welfare is associated with stronger farm animal protection legislation across countries and that concerns about specific animals can vary depending on cultural and religious factors. Contrary to study hypotheses, we did not find greater support for advocacy in countries with more advocacy organisations, suggesting important opportunities to pursue advocacy in relatively neglected regions. Results are interpreted in terms of how farmed animal advocates can take advantage of and potentially generate support for animal welfare throughout the world.</p> Christopher Bryant, Christopher J. Hopwood, João Graça, Adam T. Nissen, Courtney Dillard, Andie Thompkins Copyright (c) 2024 Christopher Bryant, Christopher J. Hopwood, João Graça, Adam T. Nissen, Courtney Dillard, Andie Thompkins https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://phair.psychopen.eu/index.php/phair/article/view/10337 Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 -0700